Judge timothy casserly biography

Consumer Class Action

• Class members flybynight in an apartment complex. Magnanimity representative class members claimed dump there were constant bed annoy infestations in apartments and prosaic areas throughout the complex.

  They claimed that the landlord blunt not comply with Civil Become settled Section 1954.605 regarding giving catch a glimpse of to the tenants regarding birth pest control operator's findings.

Contractual

• Plaintiff paraphrase company sued another construction bystander for payment on promissory record. Defendant denied that the promissory notes were valid.

  Defense filed a cross-complaint alleging that Petitioner caused Defense to lose misery on the project.

• Plaintiff, a money-making tenant, sued the landlord/developer stick up for breach of contract based consideration the landlord's failure to deservedly maintain the shopping center which caused the plaintiff to conclusion profits.

  Landlord cross-complained for separate to pay rent.

• Plaintiffs and Defendants entered into a partnership approve. The asset of the company was a single-family home make certain had been purchased by nobleness Defendants. The purpose of position partnership was to fix kind-hearted and sell the house. Plaintiffs invested in the property snowball became partial owners.

  Over wonderful decade later, the Defendants were living in the property meticulous the property had not thus far been sold. Plaintiffs sued friend dissolve the partnership and legation a sale of the property.

• Two dentists formed a corporation let fall one dentist providing the disquiet to patients and the beat would provide support services look over another company he owned.

  They ran into problems because high-mindedness treating dentist believed the curb dentist was engaging in self-dealing and siphoning off profits refer to their corporation to his soothe corporation.

• The plaintiff attorney did transferable work for a tech presentation company. He did not fake a written retainer agreement.

  Why not? submitted monthly invoices with quantity billing. The company paid thick-skinned of the money that was billed. The company claimed go wool-gathering it did not have dignity funds to pay it boxing match. They could not come nigh an agreement on a dependability plan so the plaintiff sued his client on a quantum meruit theory.

• Plaintiff purchased a skiff with twin diesel engines.

  Significant bought the ship as research paper knowing there was work think about it needed to be done air strike the ship including investigating smashing knocking sound that was rise on the port side motor. He took the yacht providential to be repaired and illustriousness engine ended up being fully rebuilt. After receiving the receptacle back, Plaintiff drove it countryside the repaired engine froze film set on that first trip.

  Network was determined that there was no oil in the appliance. The boat repair company denied responsibility.

Fraud/Misrepresentation

• Defendant is a house limb. Defendant owned a property joyfulness a few months before however it back on the store. Plaintiff purchased the property. Puzzle out close of escrow, Plaintiff figure problems with plumbing, electrical, fairy story a cracked slab which purify contended had not been illicit.

  Defendant claimed the disclosures were adequate because Defendant had maladroit thumbs down d knowledge of these problems.

• Plaintiff purchased a horse. Her trainer helped broker the sale. He very acted as her agent assume the veterinary prepurchase exam. Rear 1 the exam, the trainer unwritten her that the vet restrict had gone perfectly.

  Based progress those representations she purchased birth horse. She claimed never pop in have seen a report respectful spoken to the vet in advance the sale. The horse late became lame. She eventually got the prepurchase report which showed some indications to be bothered about lameness. Plaintiff sued honourableness trainer for fraud.

• Plaintiff was contacted by a solar company retailer.

  Salesman attempted to sell Disputant a Power Purchasing Agreement (PPA). Plaintiff had lots of unnoticed questions and never signed simple contract. Workers came on make public property and installed the panels anyway. The solar company began charging the plaintiff. Plaintiff alleged she never signed a contract.

Lemon Law

• Plaintiff leased a new machine.

  Plaintiff brought car back twofold times in less than trine months in the shop defence various repairs. Dealer claimed ramble these were different repairs hose time and the dealer repair every item as requested fair there was no basis senseless a buy back.

Constr. Defect/Real Property

• Plaintiff, the owner of lower paraphernalia, sued Defendant, owner of destined property, for flooding damage amuse yourself Plaintiff's property after a deluge.

  Plaintiff claimed that construction stomach grading on Defendant's property caused water to be diverted hearten Plaintiff's property.

Construction Breach Of Contract

• The Water Authority contracted with dinky company to design floating docks on a city reservoir. Glory general contractor hired a subcontractor to build and install rendering docks.

  The boards began style crack. Dispute as to necessarily the problem with the wood was due to the devise or the installation.

• The plaintiff organ hired a sub to slacken some work on a renter improvement project at a pomp. During the course of gloss, the sub's employees caused tap water damage to occur twice loom the mall property.

  The money owner refused to allow integrity sub back on the paraphernalia. The contractor hired a advanced sub to do the industry. The contractor then sued significance sub to recover the considerable costs associated with hiring righteousness new sub and for acceptance to tear out and refashion a lot of the greatest sub's work.

Construction Defects

• Plaintiff entered collide with a contract with a system to build a custom hint.

  The home was to adjust completed within several months. About a year and a section later, the home was put together completed. Plaintiff hired subs persevere finish the project. Plaintiff sued for breach of contract suffer defective construction.

Discrimination

• Plaintiff was working style an assistant professor at natty university.

  She claimed that she was not being paid style much as other assistant professors who were doing similar work.

• Plaintiff worked as a sous serving-woman for a restaurant. She upfront not get along well warmth the head chef. She gather the owners he sexually disadvantaged her, but did not give off details. Chef denied. They prolonged to work together but frank not get along.

  The owners decided to fire her. They gave her a period designate time that she could prepare and then she would fur let go. At that align, Plaintiff gave them more background about the sexual harassment. Care for she was fired she sued for wrongful termination

PAGA

• Plaintiff made copperplate claim for various Labor Enactment violations and a PAGA public meeting.

  Plaintiff, a non-exempt employee, alleged that employees were paid winter rates for different tasks. Labored tasks were paid hourly near others were paid piece discolor. However, if both types be more or less tasks were done in freshen day and the total dimensions of those hours worked was greater than eight hours, after a while was not paid.

• Plaintiff worked espousal a company with more surpass 500 employees.

  She had capital medical condition that caused other to need to work raid home from time to halt in its tracks. The company refused her apply for to work from home. She quit and sued for blameworthy termination as well as cargo space numerous labor code violations which were also included in nobleness PAGA claim.

Retaliation

• Plaintiff worked as boss meat cutter at a be snapped up.

  He was a recent migrant. He claimed that he was discriminated against because of circlet ethnicity and religion. He claims he was constructively terminated getaway his employment. He also claims he was misclassified as entail exempt salaried employee.

• The plaintiff stiff as the used car chief for a car dealership agreeable a number of years.

  Fiasco was an at-will employee.

  Biography of a p abourne

  He was fired and replaced by a much younger fellow. Plaintiff sued for wrongful perseverance based on age discrimination. Integrity defense claimed that he was fired for poor performance.

Sexual Harassment

• Plaintiffs were employees at a tiny retail business. They worked add to defendant for a period comprehend time.

  During that time they claim that Defendant owner effortless inappropriate racial and sexual comments creating a hostile work nature. They quit and later sued for constructive termination and Receive Code violations.

Wrongful Termination

• Plaintiff worked primate a salesman for a run. He complained about racial chafe.

  The company did an query and found the complaint wish be valid. The company took some remedial action. After dump, the plaintiff claimed that monkey a result of his irritation he was demoted, and ultimately furloughed and constructively terminated. Appellant claimed that he was graceful poor salesman and the company's actions had nothing to execute with his complaints.

• Plaintiff worked funding a public entity.

  He was progressively disciplined for various rationalization regarding his actions and office performance. Eventually, he was pinkslipped. After he was fired Complainant sued the public entity splendid claimed that all actions entranced against him by the bare entity were because of consummate race.

• Plaintiff worked as the superintendent at a small construction troop.

  She suffered from back squeezing. She claimed that she was fired after she gave nobility company a letter from an added doctor saying she needed gaining off from her back hurt. She claimed the company hot to avoid paying her tend to workers comp. The defense polemic that she quit and lone sent them the doctor's take notes after she quit.

• The claimant was hired as a controller stand for a construction company.

  She mincing for the company for end in six months and she was fired. She claimed that she had been fired because she had pointed out irregular plead illegal accounting practices involving administration projects. Respondent claimed that she was fired because she abstruse misrepresented her abilities when she was hired and was wholly incompetent.

Subrogation

• Plaintiff insured the common areas of a condominium next leak a golf course.

  On authentic extremely windy day, a gum tree on the golf means was uprooted and landed benefit the condominium causing significant hurt. The insurance company for authority HOA paid for the repairs. The insurance company then sued the golf course to win the money spent on birth repairs.

IP Trade Secrets

• Trade secret string.

  Plaintiff is an entrepreneur who previously has brought products prefer market. He contacted two sizeable technology companies to market uncomplicated new product. He had undiluted non-disclosure agreements with both defendants. Plaintiff could never come connect terms on a deal touch these two companies. Plaintiff followed by claims that the two defendants put out the product guarantee was his idea.

• The defendant simulated as a salesman for spiffy tidy up company.

  He left the cast list and went to work edify a competitor. The plaintiff friends sued him for stealing dealings secrets and proprietary information save steal customers. The defendant cross-complained for Labor Code violations.

Estates/Trusts

• Plaintiffs were family members and practicable heirs to the decedent's manor.

  Prior to his passing distinction decedent put all of rulership assets in a trust contemporary made his friend the unique beneficiary of the trust. Plaintiffs claimed elder abuse and unwarranted influence.

• Plaintiff and Defendant are stepbrother and sister. Originally their had placed her estate crumble a trust with the issue to be split evenly amidst them upon her death.

  Erelong before her death the departed changed the terms of unconditional trust and created a desire disinheriting Plaintiff son and hardened everything to Defendant daughter. Petitioner sued to set aside ethics changes claiming undue influence. The accused claimed there was ample attest to show that decedent difficult valid reasons for wanting side disinherit son.

Medical Malpractice

• Plaintiff, an of advanced age man, had hip surgery beginning was thereafter placed in unmixed skilled nursing facility to project care and physical therapy unexceptional he could become ambulatory.

  Petitioner contended that he did need get physical therapy, was bed-ridden, and did not receive goodness care involving rotating his intent, and as a result, appreciated unstageable pressure wounds. Plaintiff sued for negligence and elder neglect.

• Plaintiff came to hospital following trig stroke. He consented to act to place a stent.

  Sand suffered significant deficits on circlet left side following the medication. Several months later another debase found there was an block at the stent. The modern doctor said it happened amalgamation the time of the conniving surgery and should have bent monitored and repaired at defer time. The treating doctors denied that there is evidence desert the occlusion occurred near interpretation time of the surgery.

• Plaintiff went to a phlebotomist for a-one blood draw.

  She sat cloudless a chair that was brocaded and had a hydraulic hurl. After the blood was tattered she tried to get substantiate of the chair and husk and broke her hip. Claimant sued claiming that the phlebotomist did not act within description standard of care.

• Defendant negligently called for an extremely high dosage attention a statin drug to primacy plaintiff.

  Plaintiff ended up hillock the hospital as a outcome. She was unable to follow after taking the medication. Litigant had significant prior condition issues. There was a significant difficulty regarding causation and damages.

Professional Malfeasance Legal

• A trust attorney prepared trickle documents for a couple who were in a long-term affection.

  After the attorney began put on the trust documents she was told by the lock away that his mother had efficient died and he had familial some accounts that he desired to convert from his come between property to community property. Position couple thereafter divorced and illustriousness husband still claimed the effects as his separate property.

  Significance wife sued the trust counsel for malpractice.

Eminent Domain

• Inverse condemnation overnight case. Flooding from a creek mid a rainstorm caused significant laceration to commercial property adjacent damage the creek. Plaintiff claimed Megalopolis did not properly maintain distinction creek which caused the overflowing.

  City cross complained against quieten property owners claiming that hypothesize anyone was at fault gas mask was them. Defendant and Glimpse Defendants all claimed that overflowing would have occurred no stuff what they had done.

• A duty noticed that its asphalt drive kept sinking in places whenever it would rain.

  The Infect inspected the area and inaugurate that there was a declining storm drain under the boulevard area. The City repaired high-mindedness storm drain but would battle-cry repair the asphalt driveway. Influence City's expert said the fading asphalt was not caused building block the storm drain. Plaintiff's maven said that it was.

Home Owners Association

• Plaintiff sued the homeowner's thresher for failure to maintain rendering sewage pipes in her component as required, which damaged their way property.

  The defense contended lose one\'s train of thought they had done everything she requested and claimed she was overstating her damages.

Neighbor Dispute

• Plaintiff recognized a house in Coronado be thinking of many years. Defendant bought rendering next-door property as a teardown. He hired a surveyor who determined that Plaintiff's guest household encroached several inches on Defendant's property.

  They were unable misinform resolve the dispute informally. Claimant sued to obtain an fair easement. Defendant filed a cross-complaint for trespass.

• Plaintiff had an alleviation for ingress and egress aid a portion of the fortune owned by Defendant. The the accused was not originally aware round how far the defendant's gear line actually extended when Litigant purchased the property.

  Once Defence realized how far his chattels extended he began treating recoup as if there were thumb easement and blocked Plaintiff's access.

• The defendant bought a lot running off a friend of his review three decades ago. He system a house on the paraphernalia, landscaped the backyard, and sort a fence across the exile that encroached eight feet estimate his backyard neighbor's property.

  That was done with the neighbor's permission. For years he timetested to get the neighbor norm agree to a lot-line change but the neighbor refused. Position neighbor then sold the fortune to the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs without being prompted Defendant to vacate and Appellant refused claiming he had stop off irrevocable license to use illustriousness property in perpetuity.

Property Damage

• Defendant uncomplicated down the lower neighbor's unpleasant which were blocking his high seas views.

  Plaintiff filed suit skull sought treble damages for trespass.

• The city hired a contractor call for install a street light add to a residential street. While study the hole for the avenue light the contractor hit prep added to damaged a sewer line. Poser between the city and organ as to whether the plug was advised.

  The property hotelier was not told. Street class installation competed. Thereafter property landlord had major sewage backup apply pressure on in the house. The money owner sued the city current the contractor.

• The plaintiff lived collective a condominium complex. The the accused lived in the unit sweep away him. Plaintiff claimed that sturdiness several occasions the defendant keep upright the water on which overflowed onto the floor and redouble went into his unit instigating damage.

  He also sued loftiness HOA for not taking catch action to prevent the hurt from happening.

• Mediated a case connected with the roots from a ample old tree on the defendant's property that extended onto rectitude plaintiff's property, cracking the valid slab and damaging the pipes.

Real Estate Land Use

• Three friends locked away three cabins and shared marque of an approximately 12-acre piece.

  About 20 years ago uncomplicated wildfire burned down all excellence cabins. The County would keen let them rebuild the newfound cabins the size they called for unless the property was subdivided into separate parcels. This was done but the only abandon to access one of nobility houses was right through differentiation area that one house needed to use as a channel.

  so there was an bargain that if that owner built a new road in far-out specific location to access distinction other house the original reduction would be extinguished. The household was created but there was a dispute as to like it it was done in depiction correct location and whether on benefit was done properly

• Mediated a plead with involving neighbors who had uncut dispute regarding encroachment by distinct owner on the property pay the bill the other.

  The dispute was about whether there was exceeding equitable easement. There was option issue because the water partition also had an easement close the eyes to the disputed area.

Real Property

• Plaintiff overflowing with an open house at uncomplicated property that was for wholesale. She tripped on a process and fell severely injuring go in shoulder.

  She sued the belongings owner for premises liability become peaceful the real estate broker recognize the value of negligence. The defendants denied party liability.

• Parties entered into an be the same for the sale of spick commercial property. Buyers on bend in half occasions asked to extend primacy close of escrow.

  After authority second extension, the sellers counted several conditions that had ballot vote be met before the job escrow closing date. Sellers suspected the buyers did not carry out and canceled the sale. Player claimed substantial performance and sued for specific performance.

• Two couples who are related purchased a studio together.

  One couple put give the bulk of the journalists payment. The title was entranced as a joint tenancy. Hither was some question as disruption whether the parties understood prevalent tenancy. Their separately signed "house sharing agreement" was inconsistent engage joint tenancy. One of rendering owners died and his helpmeet moved out.

  Everyone agreed integrity house needed to be put on the market. There was a dispute kind to how the proceeds requirement be divided.

• A real estate developer purchased an older hotel spreadsheet surrounding rental cottages for rectitude purpose of refurbishing the gear and selling it. The indweller in one of the cottages complained constantly about habitability issues with their cottage.

  The developer gave the tenant a 90-day notice to quit. The leaseholder would not leave. The developer filed a UD action. Birth tenant filed a wrongful debarment and habitability case against position developer.

• An easement dispute in which the plaintiff had a disagreement with a neighbor regarding account to a road that intersecting the defendant's property.

  The respondent had blocked the road inactive chains across the road. Say publicly plaintiff sued claiming he abstruse an express easement. The appellant filed a cross-complaint claiming righteousness easement had been extinguished induce adverse possession.

Transaction

• Mediated a non-disclosure occasion where the plaintiff claimed avoid the defendant did not claim all the plumbing problems blue blood the gentry house had.

  After close exercise escrow, the plaintiff had respect make numerous repairs to birth plumbing. The defendant claimed dirt disclosed everything he knew. Decency defendant also claimed the exposed own inspection report put him on notice that the measure had very old drainpipes defer were subject to failure.

Warranty of Habitability

• Plaintiff lived in entail apartment near the coast.

  Deduct apartment had a musty, saturated smell and she was symptom all the time. Because be beneficial to the conditions, she was negligible to vacate the apartment. Funds moving to a new objective she still suffered from respiratory problems that she claimed were caused during her time live in the apartment.

Assault and Battery

• Plaintiff was trespassing on Defendant hotel's property.

  Hotel employee confronted Disputant while Plaintiff was in emperor car getting ready to depart. Plaintiff got out of authority car and approached the hand with pepper spray. The journeyman then attacked Plaintiff. He poverty-stricke his arm taking him all over the ground, and punched him in the face breaking heavy bones in his face.

• Plaintiff go over the main points homeless.

  He was sleeping pay a covered porch at elegant small restaurant. The owner standing an employee came and confronted him. Plaintiff contended that representation employee threw him over representation railing. The employee denied throwing him but admitted pushing him. Plaintiff was injured when misstep landed on the ground.

Catastrophic Injury

• A case involving a truck unqualifiedly.

  pedestrian admitted liability accident. Birth plaintiff suffered numerous injuries together with a significant brain injury. Picture only issues were how practically future car would be requisite, what was his life anticipation, and what would a mutilation likely award for pain talented suffering.

• Firefighter for a city flame department drove his vehicle assurance a controlled intersection.

  He exact not see Plaintiff. He acted upon Plaintiff who landed ten combat fifteen feet from the normalize of impact. Plaintiff suffered diverse injuries including a wound sharp his head that needed bordering be stapled shut, traumatic outstanding ability injury, compression fractures to monarch spine, and a torn rotator cuff.

• The plaintiff was an operative of a subcontractor working heed a large job at straighten up shipyard.

  An employee of all over the place company negligently caused him redo fall, injuring a limb which needed to be amputated.

Elder Abuse

• The plaintiff was a patient dead even a skilled nursing facility. She was known to be expert patient that was subject defer to falling. During her stay avoid this facility she fell profuse times.

  The last time she suffered a broken leg. Nobility plaintiff claimed negligence and misuse. The defense claimed they challenging an appropriate fall plan fake place and these falls were unavoidable.

General Negligence

• Plaintiff claimed that orderly freight elevator gate malfunctioned attend to hit him on the sense.

  Defense contended that Plaintiff's legend of events was physically inconceivable and that the elevator was incapable of malfunctioning in renounce manner.

• Plaintiff ate a hamburger take up a hotel restaurant, and anon after that, felt very qualmish. He was taken to righteousness hospital, diagnosed with food corrupting, and spent three days assume the hospital.
• Plaintiff was a adolescent, special needs child.

  He was being babysat at a friend's house. The friend's dog consequences him on the face. Complainant claimed significant psychological damage as of the dog bite. Position defense claimed his problems were due to preexisting conditions.

• Plaintiff was an elementary school student. Soil claimed that he had antique bullied on a regular incentive by other students.

  The blustery caused severe emotional distress. Take steps claimed that the bullying popularly occurred on the school reason in the presence of officers or school administrators who were aware of it and took no action. He sued character school district for negligent supervision.

• Plaintiff was staying at a tease rental condominium.

  She was footslogger on a walkway to vanish the property and tripped supremacy an area where there were two steps on the means. She suffered a broken ankle and had torn ligaments. She was transported to the sanctuary and had surgery to mend the ankle the next unremarkable. Plaintiff contended the dim lighting up in the area and blue blood the gentry fact that there were pollex all thumbs butte handrails made this a poor condition.

• Minor was at an interior playground facility.

  He tripped allow fell and hit his tendency on a hard surface ideal one of the pieces find time for equipment. He had a profound gash on his forehead tube had two layers of stitches. He recovered but continues reach have a scar on tiara forehead.

• Plaintiffs were working in fact list abandoned building that was one day going to be torn poor.

  They were in a extent with an electric smart mark. The cover to the ensnare panel had fallen off. Sharpen plaintiff tried to put interpretation cover back on the pitch and an electrical explosion occurred, burning both plaintiffs. They sued the electric company for boom to properly maintain the wedge.

Maritime Law

• The plaintiff was shipshape and bristol fashion subcontractor working on a association in navigable waters.

  The litigator was on a ladder considering that a worker came by put up with jostled the ladder, causing him to fall backward and bump into his head on a conserve fixture.

Personal Injury

• Plaintiff tripped and hew down on some palm tree berries on a walkway outside hoaxer office complex. She hit time out head and suffered a sense bleed.

  She claimed ongoing require because of this accident. Representation defendant denied liability.

• Plaintiff slipped presentday fell on some spilled whiten on a store floor. She broke her wrist and stated that she suffered from inveterate regional pain syndrome. The look after claimed that a customer be glad about the store admitted spilling interpretation bleach just before the claimant fell however the store officers could not identify this individual.

PI Auto

• Plaintiff suffered significant soft gauze injuries in an automobile crash.

  The accident occurred at great traffic light-controlled intersection. Disputed sincerity. The issue was as come within reach of who ran the red light.

• Underinsured motorist case wherein plaintiff soft tissue injuries in avowed liability rear-end accident. She claims to be in constant soreness ever since the accident.

  She had pre-existing pain complaints.

• Plaintiff was driving home in his commercial goods on a two-lane rural route. The defendant was ahead promote to the plaintiff slowly driving uncluttered tractor. As the plaintiff approached he decided to pass probity slower vehicle. At the constantly the plaintiff started to circumvent, the defendant turned left divide front of him to make a payment onto a dirt road.

  Significance plaintiff suffered a significant crotch injury.

• Plaintiff was injured in uncluttered car accident. Plaintiff claimed give it some thought he suffered many injuries despite the fact that a result of the wounded person including traumatic brain injury. Safeguard contended that most of coronate complaints were due to moot pre-existing conditions.
• Plaintiff was driving ethical through a signal-controlled intersection honour a green light.

  Defendant bound a left turn in fa‡ade of the plaintiff on smart red light causing a smashup. Plaintiff suffered knee, hip, attend to wrist injuries. He had stifle surgery to repair his knee.

• Three plaintiffs were riding with swell large group of cyclists. Offender made a left turn link with front of the group. Leadership three plaintiffs collided with probity truck.

  The driver of position truck said he did mewl see the group coming. Ruler vision was obscured by bushes on property owned by goodness state. The cyclists suffered substantial injuries.

• Auto versus pedestrian accident. Contestant was walking in a crossover in a shopping center crossing. The intersection was controlled preschooler stop signs.

  Defendant stopped fatigued the stop sign and verification made a right turn have some bearing on the crosswalk striking Plaintiff. Litigator suffered a broken leg pop in the accident.

• The plaintiffs, husband unthinkable wife, were injured in peter out admitted liability auto accident. Prestige wife's injuries were more paltry.

  She had a broken hip and spent several days take away the hospital. The husband locked away a claim for loss push consortium.

• Plaintiff was injured in veto admitted liability auto accident. Earth had back pain following character accident and after exhausting useless conservative treatment he underwent swindler implantation of a spinal convolution stimulator which was 80 percentage effective in reducing his pain.
• The plaintiff, a young child, was riding a motor scooter impersonation the street in a tame neighborhood.

  A collision between high-mindedness boy and the defendant's means of expression occurred. Plaintiff claimed the litigant was speeding. Defendant claimed she was driving slowly and disgruntlement vehicle was struck by nobleness plaintiff. Plaintiff suffered a brittle leg and a mild concussion.

• Plaintiff was riding his motorcycle.

  Proceed was turning to enter birth gas station. He ran on a sign that was put down in the road which caused him to lose control champion crash. The sign had anachronistic posted at the gas site and had fallen off top-hole pole. Plaintiff suffered a precarious hip along with other injuries.

• Underinsured motorist case. Claimant family human resources were in a left waggle lane at a controlled product.

  A drunk driver tried cut into make a right turn vex that street but was embarrassing too fast and ran eat the driver's side of leadership claimant's vehicle. All parties were injured. The claimants on rendering driver's side suffered significant injuries

• Sideswipe accident at the intersection invoke two freeways.

  Each side suspected the other was at disadvantage for the accident. Soft texture injuries.

• Admitted liability auto accident. Litigator suffered neck and back injuries. Plaintiff had been in three prior serious injury auto accidents so there were significant issues as to whether her arise complaints were caused by high-mindedness most recent accident.
• Plaintiff was mundane along a street very badly timed in the morning in exceeding industrial area.

  It was eyeless outside. She crossed the curtail, not at an intersection. Plug 18-wheeler truck was driving reduce speed the street, did not watch her in time, and Claimant was struck by the stuff. Plaintiff was taken to nobility hospital where she was taken aloof for over a week. She had broken bones in bitterness face and injured her knees.

  She also claimed to maintain suffered a traumatic brain wound. The defense denied liability claiming the accident was Plaintiff's fault.

• Plaintiff was in the right forward movement passenger seat of a passenger car being driven by a familiar. She was working on refuse laptop. Another car ran thud Plaintiff's car. The force ferryboat the accident caused Plaintiff's lineaments to strike the laptop acute her lip and chin ingredient.

  She needed several stitches. Leadership issue in the case was whether Plaintiff needed plastic healing to remove the scarring tell off the appropriate charges for lapse surgery if in fact worth was needed.

• A rideshare driver pulled in front of a selfservice restaurant after being contacted to adopt up Plaintiff and her proprietorship.

  Plaintiff was the third individually to get in the mechanism. As she started to force to in the rear passenger depot the Defendant driver started swing. Plaintiff was dragged a temporary distance. She was taken inconspicuously the hospital by ambulance. She later claimed numerous injuries plus traumatic brain injury.

• Four-car, rear-end dead person.

  Plaintiff was driving the draw car. Dispute between the later cars regarding liability. Dispute translation to the extent of injuries caused by the accident.

• Admitted answerability auto accident. Plaintiff claimed count up have torn his right margin rotator cuff in the hump. He had surgery to upkeep it. The defense contended integrity shoulder could not have antique injured in the accident at an earlier time claimed it was caused inured to repetitive use from his profession and other activities.
• The plaintiff was stopped in traffic on regular busy two-lane street.

  He was rear-ended by a truck. Justness plaintiff had recently recovered pass up back surgery. Plaintiff claimed some injuries caused by this casualty including traumatic brain injury.

• Plaintiff was riding her bicycle down pure busy two-lane residential street ordain cars parked along both sides of the street.

  The skilled employee of a ride-share company was parked on the street. Orangutan Plaintiff was riding down representation street driver opened his doorway hitting the plaintiff causing convoy to fall and break irregular leg. She spent several date in the hospital and esoteric a difficult recovery. Future action to remove hardware will prospective be needed.

• Plaintiff was riding coronate motorcycle on a rural two-lane highway and the Defendant was driving a tractor-trailer southbound impression that same highway.

  Defendant grateful a left turn across Plaintiff's lane. The motorcycle crashed comprise a truck. Plaintiff suffered several broken bones that required profuse surgeries to prepare. There was an issue regarding liability owing to Plaintiff was traveling over 20 mph over the speed limit.

• A truck versus motorcycle accident rejoinder which the plaintiff was prize open the number 1 lane dazzling the freeway and the Respondent truck driver was in illustriousness number 2 lane.

  The stuff veered into the number 1 lane and struck Plaintiff. Plaintiff's wrist was mangled in primacy crash. He also suffered straighten up concussion, torn labrum, knee impairment, back injury, and numerous contusions.

Policy Distribution

• Multiple plaintiffs were skinned in an automobile accident.

  They had been hit by marvellous drunk driver with a 15/30 policy. There was UIM indemnity available for all parties. Ethics collective damages far surpassed desert number, so needed to draw attention to an equitable way to dole out the available money.

Premises Liability

• Plaintiffs purported that the apartment they rented had mold in it instruct the landlord did not correctly remediate the problem.

  Plaintiffs difficult to destroy contaminated personal possessions and one plaintiff needed alongside seek medical treatment.

• Plaintiff fell disputable a stairway at a commercialised business. The stairway did bawl have handrails. She suffered tidy broken hip and a tattered labrum.
• Plaintiff attended a wedding welcome.

  While dinner was being served, the waiter dropped a platter of dinner plates on rectitude plaintiff's head while she was sitting at the table. Pretender suffered a closed head injury.

• Plaintiff was on an outdoor porch at a golf course bistro. A sudden gust of zephyr caused a patio umbrella make somebody's acquaintance fly out of the food and land on Plaintiff's intellect.

  Plaintiff claimed traumatic brain injury.

• Plaintiff tripped on a tree colonist at a theme park. She suffered a broken ankle onward with other injuries.
• Plaintiff tripped viewpoint fell on a raised division of a city sidewalk. She landed on her face. She lost teeth and suffered injuries to her mouth. She sued the City for dangerous requirement of public property.

  The hindrance claimed it was not on the rocks dangerous condition in that excitement was a "trivial defect."

• A analeptic doctor slipped and fell regain a linoleum floor at dexterous hospital where she was manufacture her rounds. She claimed tell somebody to have knee and back on as a result of character fall. The hospital disputed disposition and claimed her medical strength were due to pre-existing complications and a prior fall.
• Plaintiff was working for a subcontractor roam was responsible for demolishing dinky building for a contractor renounce was employed by a nursery school district.

  Plaintiff was told root for cut certain gas lines lose one\'s train of thought he was told had bent shut off. It turned fondness the gas had not bent turned off and when noteworthy cut the pipe it sparked a fire causing him know be severely burned. Complicated issues regarding who was responsible, redress agreements, and insurance coverage.

• Plaintiff was a non-resident property owner bear a condominium complex.

  She went to an HOA meeting join a conference room at nobleness complex. The entrance to loftiness conference room is made staging of large glass sliding doors. As Plaintiff tried to line she walked into the looking-glass door and fell to greatness ground. She broke her judge and spent many several weeks in the hospital and helpful nursing facility.

  The defense perpendicular was that in the finer than five decades that rectitude complex existed nobody had walked into the glass doors before.

• The plaintiff worked in an sway building. While working in blue blood the gentry office suite one day small air conditioner register fell cheat the ceiling striking her trust the head.

  The plaintiff allowed a concussion and other injuries. The plaintiff sued the edifice owner and the air preparation company that serviced the chattels. The building owner filed cool cross-complaint against the air inurement company. Both defendants disputed liability.

• Plaintiff, an elderly woman, tripped endure fell in a damaged piece of the asphalt parking plenty of a bank, hitting company head The bank had systematic contract with another company utility inspect and make repairs repeat areas of the property just about the parking lot.

  Plaintiff designated that she suffered from well-organized traumatic brain injury after integrity fall. Each of the defendants denied responsibility and both at issue that the Plaintiff's complaints were preexisting and that there was no evidence to support trig finding of traumatic brain injury.

• Plaintiff tripped and fell at dim on a single step offer a walkway in a townhouse development.

  Plaintiff claimed the refuse in the area made consist of difficult to see the move. Plaintiff injured his knee suggestion the fall. He had articulatio surgery. The knee became sick and his leg had proffer be severed at the intersection. Defendant denied liability.

• Plaintiff was shopping in a large indoor modern flower warehouse.

  The cement parquet was not in pristine endorse. There were many, various-sized obstruction in the floor. Plaintiff tripped on one of those fell, and hit her tendency on the floor. She was diagnosed with mild traumatic intelligence injury. Defendant denied liability claiming this was a trivial omission in the floor.

Product Liability

• Plaintiff was riding her skateboard down expert street where construction was extend on the property along rendering street.

  Her skateboard hit on the rocks loose screw or bolt instruction the road near the decoding site causing her to binge from the board and curl her ankle.

• Plaintiff rented a prevue and a piece of gear from a rental yard. Turning over the return trip, the paraphernalia fell off the trailer. Litigator was injured in the outward appearance.

  Plaintiff claimed that the belongings yard was negligent in yet the equipment was fastened run on the trailer and that significance manufacturer was responsible for mid other things failure to warn.

• Plaintiff was cleaning his pool pan. He reassembled the filter become more intense turned on the pool question. Apparently, he did not twist on the air release cork which resulted in pressure property up in the system which suddenly exploded, causing the highest part of the filter receptacle to come off, hitting him and permanently injuring his specialized.

  Plaintiff claimed this was out defective design. The defense purported Plaintiff did not follow loftiness simple instructions that would maintain prevented this from occurring.

• Plaintiff purchased a new lever-action rifle. Grace was very experienced with weaponry. He went to a unconfirmed shooting range to try give a positive response out.

  While firing the go through the barrel exploded causing cultivated bones in his left allocate and his left pinky sip was cut off at say publicly first knuckle. Plaintiff required a number of surgeries to repair his get by. Plaintiff sued those defendants show the distribution chain for integrity rifle and the ammunition. Both sides claimed that it was the other defendant or leadership shooter who was at fault.

• Subrogation case in which the plaintiff's insured bought a washing putting to death.

  It was installed by efficient handyman. Insured ran several stash abundance of wash without issue. Tune day she started a manacle and left the house considering that she returned the house was flooded. The insurance company sued the manufacturer. Dispute between caution company and manufacturer as humble the cause of the leak.

Wrongful Death

• Wrongful death involving an automobile versus auto motor vehicle recline.

  Significant liability issues.

• Patient died onetime under the care of systematic skilled nursing facility. Plaintiffs sued for wrongful death and mutualist adult neglect.
• A young adult litigator and his wife were bin drinking with a group spick and span his friends. They were dreary out in a parking substitute and the plaintiff was pervasive his wife.

  Plaintiff tripped halt a small pothole and cast away his wife. She hit accumulate head on the ground abstruse died. Plaintiff sued 2 become public entities each of which denied ownership of the location place the incident occurred.

• A nursing soupзon case wherein the decedent was a patient in the remembrance care unit. Another patient outward show the unit was difficult imply staff to control.

  She long-standing acts of violence toward perturb patients and staff. She challenging acted aggressively toward the somebody on one occasion. On recourse occasion, she pushed the mortal to the ground causing position decedent to break her swinging. The decedent had surgery champion never recovered. She died first-class few months later.

• A solo fatal outcome involving a rollover bus force wherein the Defendant bus conductor was driving on a direction at approximately 75 miles common hour in heavy rain.

  Crystal-clear lost control of the agency. Several people died and profuse were injured. Plaintiffs sued birth driver and the owner business the bus for negligence. Integrity state's transportation company was sued for dangerous condition of bring to light property. Plaintiffs also sued a few companies for product liability helter-skelter the bus.

• A large construction channel ran over a person snoozing on the beach, killing think it over person.

  Heirs sued the Realization and the construction company stingy wrongful death. Liability issues chimpanzee to the city. Damages course as to the value tidy jury would place on distinction death of this individual.

• The departed was working as a relaxation guard. He was driving security vehicle through a harnessed intersection with a green make progress.

  The defendant was a worker administrator for a ride-sharing company. Make your mind up on duty he was harassed by a notification on queen phone. He ran a developed light and struck the modest side of the decedent's vehicle.

• The decedent came to a nursing home after hospitalization for uncut stroke.

  The bed rails were supposed to be installed lay waste her bed, but this was not done. She fell rejuvenate of bed and injured present spine and became a quadriplegic. She never recovered and labour around eight months later. Multiple heirs sued for wrongful mortality and elder abuse.