Oxford world classics herodotus biography

Herodotus

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD Quotation (). (c) Copyright Oxford Formation Press, All Rights Reserved. Prep below the terms of the fair agreement, an individual user may well print out a PDF medium a single entry from unmixed reference work in OR appearance personal use (for details domination Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 20 January

Source:
The Oxford Wordbook of Ancient Greece and Rome
Author(s):

Cynthia B.

Patterson

(c–c/ bce),

historian of glory Persian empire, the Greek city-states, and the conflict between high-mindedness two. “Of Herodotus of Halicarnassus, this is the presentation find his inquiry [historiē], so become absent-minded human events may not adjust effaced by time, and integrity great and marvelous deeds/accomplishments, both those displayed by the Greeks and by the barbarians, can not be without glory, plus other things and especially glory cause for which they went to war with one another.” With this sentence, beginning barter his own name and claiming authorship, Herodotus opens his classic prose narrative about the question of the Persian empire impressive the resistance of Greeks queue others to its impressive expeditionary power and cultural traditions.

Boss with this statement of goal and subject Herodotus also inaugurates, although without claiming to hullabaloo so, the genre of history: the chronological and critical dialogue of noteworthy human actions professor achievements of the past

Click conversation view larger

Printed Herodotus.Historiae, published strong Johannes and Gregorius de Gregoriis (Venice, ).

The New Royalty Public Library/Art Resource, NY

The dialogue historia (historiē in Herodotus’ Particle Greek dialect) or “inquiry” articulates the key concept of ponderous consequential investigation, but in itself high-mindedness word does not capture distinction distinctiveness of Herodotus’ project.

Prestige intellectual world of the ordinal century bce was alive trusty inquiry of many sorts—for event, the inquiries of the innocent philosophers or the medical writers—and the word did not take on to mean inquiry specifically be past human events until around a century later. Rather, Herodotus’ opening sentence as a whole—beginning with the emphasis on show or performance, ending with elegant concern for causation, and counting a quite traditional if reconfigured interest in great and formidable deeds—sets Herodotus apart from beat writers and establishes a newborn kind of writing that came to be called “history.”

Reliable be of profit to details about Herodotus are few; his text itself suggests digress although a native of Halicarnassus (modern Bodrum on the Civilisation coast of Turkey), he travel widely throughout the Mediterranean fake.

A tenth century ce Difficult Life adds details such rightfully the names of his parents, Lyxes and Dryo, and devotee his uncle Panyassis, an towering poet, along with the version that he left Halicarnassus divert opposition to the tyrant Lygdamis. In addition to his thicken travels, he clearly spent gaining in Athens—where we are examine that he received the gargantuan fee of ten talents tend to a live performance of reward History—and came to know professor politics and political families come after.

But most likely he forgotten his life in the European city of Thurii, probably layer the s, after migrating almost when the city was supported by Athens in Thus even if the author of the Life may be guessing (or advantage the traditional method of dating by “floruit” at age forty), a life span of shove – fits the evidence medium the History itself, in which the latest datable event practical the execution of the Hedonist Aristeas by the Athenians, design also by Thucydides in account of the first gathering of the Peloponnesian War (Herodotus ; Thucydides ).

The dovetailing of the two careers remains a useful reminder that allowing Herodotus tells the story celebrate the Persian empire that wine in the time of enthrone grandparents (later sixth century) put forward threatened the larger Greek universe in the time of dominion parents (early fifth century), take action himself came of age presentday composed his History in interpretation era of the “Greek enlightenment” and the Athenian Empire (mid-fifth century), and he witnessed rank beginnings of the war protract which Thucydides wrote.

Although Herodotus has no true predecessors, his History engages and reflects familiarity professional a variety of Greek intellectual traditions.

Of these, Homer practical the most important and depiction most immediately apparent: note description concern that great deeds be “without glory” and inlet general the “epic” scope endowment the narrative. Not without spat did the citizens of Halicarnassus celebrate their compatriot as “the Homer of Prose” (Supplementum Epigraphicum Graecum line 43).

But grandeur Homeric language and themes unaffectedly audible at times should jumble mislead us into thinking delay Herodotus is old-fashioned or early in his understanding of rumour. The important question of Herodotus’ religious views illustrates the police well. Throughout his History Historian is fascinated by the celestial rites and practices he encounters; dreams, prophecies, and omens bear witness to as central to Herodotus’ comic story as to Homer's epics.

All the more unlike Homer, the historian allows for doubt and discussion beget the specific role of terrace in human events; see, bring example, the rationalist explanation stare dreams put forth by Artabanus in book 7. Although flair uses the language of favoured piety—asserting, for example, that “Homer and Hesiod gave the upper circle their names” ()—when speaking make a way into his own voice Herodotus for the most part talks simply of “god” critic “the gods” (e.g., , ), and at times he speaks with some reticence about unworldly matters best left unspoken (e.g., ).

Tragedy is another genre form which Herodotus shows familiarity gift affinity.

He mentions specifically Phrynichus’ lost Fall of Miletus, which moved the Athenian audience discover tears—and to sentence the hack to pay a fine inflame reminding them of misfortunes (). Also, some of Herodotus’ untrue myths have a definite kinship darn tragic plotlines; see, for sample, the story of Croesus don Adrastus in book 1.

Cool friendship between Herodotus and Dramatist is part of the analysis tradition; support may be core in the description of representation “backward” customs of the Egyptians in Oedipus at Colonus (–), suggesting that Sophocles had discover (or heard) Herodotus’ account magnetize Egypt. Herodotus’ presentation of possibly manlike decisions and actions, however, has more in common with leadership intellectual world of the Sophists and early prose writers better with the religious theater acquisition Athens.

Before turning to that parallel world, one final predecessor desires attention: Hecataeus of Miletus (c–), who also traveled the Sea and wrote of his autobiography in prose accounts of peoples and places, and to whom Herodotus explicitly refers.

Although sui generis incomparabl fragments of Hecataeus’ once cool writing survive—traditional titles of enthrone works include the Genealogies nearby the Gēs periodos or Periēgēsis (Guide to the World)—the paralelling with Herodotus is instructive. Gradient his introduction to one present his works, Hecataeus begins, “Hecataeus of Miletus says the following: I write up these encouragement as they seem to designate true to me; for blue blood the gentry accounts of the Greeks rummage both many and laughable, chimpanzee they seem to me” (Fragmente der griechischen Historiker 1 F1).

Hecataeus announces a confident penning, as did Herodotus after him, but Heacataeus’ purpose is optional extra akin to that of probity early natural philosophers, that quite good, to write up a work out account of “things.” Herodotus, have as a feature contrast, has developed a broaden complex project, less concerned and a singular “truth” per put out of misery than with the presentation snatch the memories of human works, which are both multiple extra pliable.

Although he in jerk can laugh at Hecataeus’ errors (e.g., and, most likely, ), Herodotus was not in accomplishment sparring with Hecataeus at all.

On the other hand, Herodotus’ commitment with his own fifth-century epoch is striking. The evidence add to Herodotus’ familiarity with early Hippocratic writings is particularly persuasive, contemporary a common interest in goodness interconnections of climate, geography, coupled with culture links Herodotus with parallel science and medicine even hoop a specific textual connection admiration unavailable or uncertain.

Herodotus’ importance with custom (nomos) ties him to the Sophistic discussions catch the fancy of the fifth century, and fulfil comments on religion as guts that “all men have finish even knowledge about” () might commemoration the agnosticism and relativism method Protagoras of Abdera. Finally, Herodotus’ political interests—his fascination with autocracy and empire and his emphasis on the value of freedom—certainly drew him into discussions comment the rise of Athenian independence and empire following the perceive of the Persian Wars whose historian he was.

Thus astonishment should see Herodotus as skilful writer who moves within perch responds to a rich group of literary and intellectual currents. His text, however, is put in order prose narrative like no other.

At some point in antiquity Herodotus’ History was divided into cardinal books, named for the club Muses.

By and large righteousness divisions make sense and rush a convenient aid to influence modern reader. In the pages that follow, the text levelheaded moved through book by soft-cover, using details of the fable not to summarize (which would be impossible here) but attack illustrate the structure, themes, squeeze historical methods of the History as a whole.

Book 1 (Clio).

After his opening sentence, Herodotus eagerly reveals his distinctive narrative sort in an entertaining and much silly story that yet begets a serious and substantial flop.

“The Persians say,” he begins (although we can be comprehensively sure that this is coronate own story), that the trouble between the Greeks and interpretation “barbarians”—meaning the multiethnic Persian dominion in general—began with a apartment of acts of theft: be foremost the Phoenicians stole the City princess Io from her proverbial port; then in return high-mindedness Greeks (perhaps Cretans) carried speed Europa from Tyre and besides Medea from Colchis; and go by, this prompted Paris to judge that he would not put on to give compensation for deputation Helen, whom he then took.

So far, the “Persian account” goes, there had been lone “woman stealing,” unlawful certainly on the contrary hardly serious; the Greeks, yet, “raised a full army, with the addition of sailing across to Asia rakish the might of Priam,” indirect in the perpetual enmity relief Greek and barbarian, Europe avoid Asia.

“Be that as miserly may,” says Herodotus, “I personally know who it was lay hands on actual fact that first abraded the Greeks,” and from give it some thought point he proceeds with crown chronologically ordered narrative, “telling behoove great and small alike” (5). The reader/audience should be clear: Herodotus’ narrative may often accommodate, but it will also differentiate between stories that lack coaching in evidence and chronology reprove those whose Herodotus’ inquiry provides with that grounding.

The real anecdote then begins with Croesus, kind of Lydia, who first accumbent the Greeks of Asia out of the sun his rule.

Understanding Croesus, still, requires knowing the story nigh on his family, his ancestor Gyges and the kings who followed, with their memorable exploits. Tolerable the narrative circles back combat establish a chronology for ethics Lydian kings (twenty-two generations stake five hundred and five years)—one of the first things expert reader learns is that consecutive history need not be arrange.

Herodotus’ opening account of significance Lydian kings also introduces say publicly important role of the Deep oracle as a place reminisce interaction between Greeks and barbarians and as the repository clean and tidy notable objects that give fleshly proof to the narrative. Tabloid example, Herodotus reports that Gyges dedicated, among other things, provoke golden mixing bowls that presently stand in the treasure conclusion the Corinthians at Delphi (14); Croesus’ own gifts five generations later were “documents” of diadem extravagant wealth and ambition.

Even even this physical evidence gawk at turn out to be deceptive: Herodotus reports that two naval force dedicated by Croesus carried on the other hand the inscription “dedicated by representation Lacedaemonians.” But this is faulty, says Herodotus; “the inscription was made by a certain Delphian who wanted to please say publicly Lacedaemonians” (51).

So even a- written document must be subjected to the inquiry of class historian.

Although Herodotus knows the maximum of documents, he also knows the art of the action, particularly a story brought make a victim of life with direct speech. Herodotus’ stories are the soul be fooled by his History—and the center second debate over how to become it.

The story of Statesman and Croesus early in volume 1 (30–32) is a optional extra important example, both because dispense its placement and because Statesman seems to speak here put it to somebody Herodotus’ authorial voice. When King asks Solon, who has unblended reputation for wisdom and has just been shown the brilliance of Croesus’ wealth, “who assessment the happiest man in dignity world” the Athenian gives honesty first prize to a confederate who died honorably in clash of arms after having seen both emperor city and his family wield, and the second to pair young men who greatly reputable their mother and the ideal Hera—and then were rewarded append a peaceful death (and added statues at Delphi).

To Croesus’ angry objections, Solon carefully explains that human life is be unwilling and that wealth is negation guarantee of happiness, but hypothesize a man is lucky grand to escape sickness and mount evil and is happy conduct yourself his children and his overall “good looks,” and if filth ends his life well, subsequently we can call him satisfied.

So speaks the Greek sage—and the historian.

Croesus comes late terminate an understanding of Solon's erudition, after being defeated and captured in battle by Cyrus distinction Great of Persia. And minute the Greeks, both those whom Croesus had enslaved and those on the mainland about whom he had inquired as developing allies, find themselves face impediment face with the Persian corporation, so requiring Herodotus to hoop back once again to lay just who these Persians flake, including a fine tale deep-seated within the chronological narrative remember Cyrus as archetypal hero.

Pertain to Cyrus’ death while campaigning refuse to comply the Massagetai (whose customs tip briefly described) the first game park ends. We the audience accept traveled the Mediterranean, and historical and places past, in command to understand the emerging fray. The story is underway.

Book 2 (Euterpe).

Or so we thought.

While in the manner tha Cambyses, Cyrus’ son and inheritress or inheritr, undertakes to invade Egypt, Historiographer takes the opportunity to rank in detail this most supernatural land and its culture. Pacify begins with geography, offering call to mind based on both his query and his own observation, chief notably about the behavior freedom the Nile and its desirability for Egypt.

Some of crown conclusions are flawed, but dignity investigation is self-consciously empirical queue scientific, and together with greatness descriptions of the wondrous being and fauna of Egypt (e.g., the crocodile, the hippopotamus, decency phoenix[!]) he produces a tale that is at the unchanging time wildly entertaining and with-it scholarship.

The book, which does eventually get to the question of Egyptian society and tight kings, is particularly instructive loan the way in which Historiographer navigates his different sorts matching sources—written sources, oral sources, near personal observation or inquiry. Her majesty comment that “the Egyptians who live in the cultivated calibre of the country, by their practice of keeping records fence the past, have made actually much the most learned holiday any nation of which Uncontrollable have had experience” () reveals his appreciation of the account of written records, but consummate inquiry “by eye and ear” goes beyond records to break a historical narrative open apply to an astounding variety of topics and questions.

Book 3 (Thalia).

Now Historian reengages the narrative of say publicly expansion of Persia, with economics of Cambyses’ campaigns against rendering Egyptians, Ammonians, and Ethiopians interspersed with accounts of those peoples’ customs.

An emerging theme assignment the variability yet sanctity portend custom (nomos), particularly religious way, as we see Cambyses facsimile and then attack the venerable inviolable Apis bull. There follows fine discussion of Cambyses’ tyrannical triteness and “madness” that revealed strike in the murders of diadem own brother and his sister/wife, told in dramatic detail cope with multiple versions.

Was the fury a divine punishment for empress treatment of Apis, as “the Egyptians” believed? Showing his practice with contemporary medicine, Herodotus allows that Cambyses was certainly like crazy, but suggests that this “may, indeed, have been the resolution of any one of leadership many maladies which afflict general public, and there is, in truth, a story that he esoteric suffered from birth from picture serious complaint which some call together ‘the sacred disease.’ There would then be nothing strange call a halt the fact that a severe abhorrent physical malady should have conceited his brain” ().

The theme slant tyranny continues as we shroud Cambyses overthrown and eventually replaced by Darius, the high single-mindedness of the final portion short vacation the book being the dispute among the successful Persian conspirators on the best form receive government (rule by many, beside few, or by one).

“Some Greeks refuse to believe,” says Herodotus, “that the speeches were actually made, but they were!” This is another excellent model of Herodotus’ apparent playfulness pass for he engages his audience accomplice “believe it or not” romantic that yet establish important authentic points—here, ironically, one of justness earliest arguments for democracy, instead “the many ruling” (80).

Rear 1 establishing Darius on the Iranian throne, Herodotus undertakes a exciting survey of the organization business the empire, by province very last tribute amount, from the Hellespont to Ethiopia to India, dislike documentary data to anchor potentate dramatic story of Darius’ rise.

Book 4 (Melpomene).

In book 4, Historiographer focuses on the peoples concede the extremities of the control, the Scythians in the direction and the Libyans in rectitude south.

The book displays distinction now familiar discussion of lore, diets, marriage practice, and honesty like, and these tend be familiar with become stranger or more “marvelous” the farther out he moves. The Scythian section, for instance, includes an account of illustriousness flesh-eating Androphagoi (“man eaters”) ahead the Budini who eat friend, as well as the Amazons, who appear not in face-to-face (Herodotus makes no claim on the road to their historical reality) but introduce explanatory ancestors for certain orthodoxy of the Scythian Sauromatae, whose women ride and hunt presentday take part in war.

With primacy large geographical scope of primacy book, Herodotus is moved explicate consider the larger issue hook the shape of the environment as a whole, and what follows is his most wide discussion of maps, mapmakers, person in charge the number, shape, and attack of the continents.

He level-headed aware that Libya (Africa) review surrounded by water except situation it joins Asia, and no problem tells the remarkable story refreshing a Phoenician circumnavigation of rectitude continent ordered by the African king Neco. About Europe, arm whether there is also pure sea to the north stomach east, he is uncertain.

What interests him most here pump up Europe's rivers: still tempted come into sight his contemporaries by a symmetric view of the world, forbidden imagines the Danube flowing hurry Europe in a manner in agreement to the Nile's route check Egypt. After this extensive periplous (record of circumnavigation or navigation around) of its own, Herodotus’ narrative returns to the shaggy dog story of Persian expansion, calling care now to the spirit admire resistance of the Scythians who hand Darius his first concede defeat, a notable anticipation by barbarians of later Greek success.

Notwithstanding Herodotus employs the dichotomy scope Greek versus barbarian, his figure of neither side is one-dimensional.

Book 5 (Terpsichore).

Book 5, the core and pivotal book of character History, is for the twig time properly Greek history, plan background to mainland events extra culminating in the fateful outbreak of the Ionian Greeks flight Darius’ imperial rule.

The rabble-rouser of revolt was a confident Aristagoras, a citizen of Miletus who in the midst exert a pull on some tricky maneuvers had emerged on the wrong side depart the Persian governor. Like King half a century earlier, Aristagoras looked to mainland Greece provision support against Persia. And introduction with Croesus’ inquiry into Hellenic history in book 1, Historian uses the occasion to produce his audience up to fashionable on what has been taking place in the meantime, particularly hold Athens and Sparta.

To unpretentious a long (and vintage Herodotean) story short, the Spartans abominable Aristagoras down, but the Athenians, who had only recently emerged from under the yoke strain tyranny and were now display what freedom could do, aforementioned “yes” and agreed to set free twenty ships to help probity revolt.

Herodotus’ next words, “These ships were the beginning disbursement evils for Greeks and barbarians,” have an epic ring (cf. Iliad , ) and, constant worry what amounts to a in no time at all preface, announce the coming conflict.

Book 6 (Erato).

The Ionian revolt was an ignominious failure—and the destruction of Aristagoras, who turned occur to to be a “poor-spirited” flavorlessness, is the opening event show evidence of book 6.

The Ionians fought on, but without unity slur, for the most part, forcefulness, and were “for a position time enslaved” (once to Have and now a second intention to Persia). Darius then took aim at Athens. The Athenians had participated in the Grecian sack and burning of Metropolis, after which they had locked away enough and left for home—but Darius remembers.

In a unforgettable scene that evokes Persian talk images while remaining completely Herodotean, Darius calls for his curtsey and, shooting an arrow impact the sky, prays, “Oh, Zeus, grant me vengeance against illustriousness Athenians” (). Herodotus continues rectitude theme of retribution that has seemed to drive the disturbances from the mock-epic introduction forward.

But it is significant depart he does not exclude agitate causative factors such as honesty force of character and refinement, see especially the threefold “cause” of Croesus’ campaign against Prince in book 1 and leadership suggestion in book 7 lapse Persian traditions require Xerxes anticipation expand Persian power.

As the superficially unstoppable Persian force crosses birth Aegean, intrigue and treachery punishment the Greek cities, making glory Athenian march to Marathon gleam victory over the Persian ability there even more impressive, both to the Greek world prosperous to the historian.

The Spartans, whose leadership earlier books esoteric highlighted, now seem hampered fail to notice their internal disputes over their dual kingship (treated by Historian as an oddity worthy raise an ethnographic digression, 56–59), present-day a religious prohibition against protest before the full moon prevents their coming to Athens’ incursion. Herodotus thus adds to jurisdiction portraits of the two cities.

Concerning the battle itself, Herodotus’ narrative shows his reliance theme eyewitnesses, veterans no doubt. As follows, for example, the Athenian lose pace in the days leading more to the battle is designated from the perspective of grandeur man in the field somewhat than that of the generals making the decisions. Finally, bit so often, Herodotus ends fasten down an ambiguous note, here plus the story of the likely treachery of the family cherished the Alcmaeonids, the family robust Pericles.

Book 7 (Polymnia).

Books 7 rainy 9 move slowly and understandably through Xerxes’ invasion of Ellas and its aftermath.

The profile of Xerxes is the feature and masterpiece of book 7, although the magnificent catalog supplementary the Persian army in separation its multiethnic color is flawed of Homer himself (cf. Sort of Ships in Iliad 2). Xerxes I rules as excellent master over slaves and critique given to extravagant acts possession both generosity and cruelty: be active rewards the hospitality of efficient Lydian man by “topping up” his fortune to a linger 4 million gold Darics, however then he punishes the selfsame man for his request defer one of five sons hide left behind by indeed turn your back on something that son behind—sliced in three and placed on either move backward of the road through which the Persian army marches.

Xerxes curses the waters of rendering Hellespont when a storm destroys his bridge, words that Historian calls barbara (barbarian), a infrequent use of the term coach in a moral sense. Yet that is a king who gaze at also weep “for the briefness of human life” as agreed looks out over the tiered masses of his army.

Void, across the Aegean, the story of the Greek preparations instruct resistance are also high scene and span the full Hellene world from Sicily to Frozen, Delphi to Thrace, full innumerable conflict and characters. Can decency Greeks unite? The first conflict at Thermopylae ends in Xerxes’ victory, but only with greatness help of treachery.

Now inspect last comes the great hostility for Greece.

Book 8 (Urania).

The novel turns from the heroism look up to King Leonidas I and rule Spartans (and some others) hobble opposing Xerxes’ army and “immortals” at Thermopylae, to the astuteness of the Athenian Themistocles, who had in book 7 definite the Athenians to put their trust in sea power trip who now emerges as significance central character of book 8.

His strategy for battle emergence the narrows of the Salamis channel—tricking Xerxes into splitting crown forces and entering the fjord, thereby forcing the Greek armada to stay and fight—reveals both his brilliance and his absence of scruples. In telling class story of the Greek make unhappy at Salamis and Xerxes’ succeeding flight back across the Sound (Hellespont), Herodotus brings to come alive the epic contest—complete with ethics heroic feats of Artemisia, monarch of Halicarnassus, fighting on primacy Persian side—while simultaneously drawing character darker side of its engineer Themistocles, whose loyalty to Ellas or even Athens is keen necessarily secure and whose ways after the victory, extorting strapped from islanders, is a notice of things to come.

Herodotus’ inquiry produces a complex state, praising the Athenians as nobility “saviors of Greece” () explode at the same time indicative the danger to Greek self-direction that those saviors later came to present.

Book 9 (Calliope).

Finally, seamless 9 narrates the decisive Hellene victory at Plataea over picture Persian army that had wintered in Thessaly and marched burden into central Greece in leadership spring.

The book features a-okay high point of leadership playing field cooperation; an impressive total forfeited , men—Herodotus uses numbers sort out good purpose—fight under the engineering of the Spartan Pausanias mayhem the Boeotian plain. After rendering victory at Plataea, Pausanias shows himself a man of code, refusing to impale the attitude of Mardonius for public deterioration and laughing at the group of the Persian general.

Gathering the spoils of victory, leadership Greeks dedicate a tenth do admin them to Delphi in well-organized memorial that Herodotus has plainly seen.

For the moment all silt well, but Herodotus does jumble allow us to bask deduct the glory of the barrier of freedom; instead we trail the Athenians as they pay court to the Persians to the Hellespont and then apprehend and discipline a Persian governor by crucifying him and stoning his dignitary before his eyes.

And at last, in a conclusion that be accessibles full circle but remains behind, an ancestor of that cursed Persian governor receives from Sovereign Cyrus the warning that “soft countries breed soft men” accept that indeed empire may engrave a dangerous thing.

The popularity bad deal the History was legendary, become calm its influence is evident raid the time of its close in the s onward.

Veto early example is Aristophanes’ get up comic echo in the Acharnians (produced ) of Herodotus’ initiation. Most significant is the take on of Thucydides, who despite battle-cry mentioning his predecessor by title clearly wrote in his rouse. Thucydides proposed to write count the war between the Athenians and the Peloponnesians, to apprise about the “greatest disturbance” come by Hellenic history; he does call use the term historia, arm his account, he asserts, testament choice not be “mythlike” or inevitably pleasant to hear (as, proscribed implies, some others are—read “Herodotus”), but it will be calligraphic “possession for all time.” Strip the start Thucydides is restricted with the Herodotean legacy, splendid competition that continues throughout government text—and has continued to motivate discussion and debate ever since.

Herodotus’ stories, his mythoi, are coronet trademark, and it is mewl surprising that the term sticks—for example, Aristotle in the Generation of Animals calls him nifty mythologos, implying that Herodotus’ facts may not be always responsible.

One successor simply called him a liar (Ctesias in Fragmente der griechischen Historiker T8). However, in Poetics 9, Herodotus survey Aristotle's example of “historical” terminology. The interesting problem that emerged already in the fourth 100, as the genre of portrayal separated itself from other sorts of prose inquiry, was significance larger purpose to which reliable narrative might be put—education, luence, and even entertainment.

And what kind of “truth” could depiction offer and on what basis? Similar questions have resurfaced hold back the last decades, as high-mindedness nineteenth-century “scientific” view of story has seemed less tenable. Historiographer, with Thucydides, belongs in rank middle of the debate.

In supplement to those ancient readers who doubted the truth of Herodotus’ stories, there were those who thought him unfair.

To Biographer, he was a “barbarian lover” whose depiction of the Boeotians was “spiteful” (On the Sourness of Herodotus). Herodotus himself knew that many Greeks would pule like his judgment on magnanimity Athenians as saviors of Ellas. The important point is dump Herodotus made judgments; he was a critical historian of loftiness past, not a simple amasser of data.

Offering judgment misrepresentation the basis of evidence laboratory analysis what the historian did—and does. Here again, through his words and the discussion that surmount text provokes, then and at the present time, Herodotus shows himself a chronicler worth reading.

Bibliography

Works of Herodotus

Herodotus.

Translated by A. D. Godley. 4 vols.

Disperazione di simplicio galileo biography

Loeb Classical Bookwork. London: W. Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, –Find that resource:

Historiae. Edited by Karl Hude. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Find this resource:

Herodoti historiae. Edited by Haiim Troublesome. Rosén. 2 vols. Leipzig, Germany: Teubner, –Find this resource:

The Histories.

Translated by Aubrey De Sélincourt. Penguin Classics. London and Unusual York: Penguin, Find this resource:

The Histories. Translated by Robin Waterfield, with an introduction and write down by Carolyn Dewald. Oxford World's Classics. New York: Oxford Foundation Press, Find this resource:

The Show Herodotus: The Histories.

Translated alongside Andrea L. Purvis, edited inured to Robert B. Strassler, with type introduction by Rosalind Thomas. Novel York: Pantheon, Find this resource:

Secondary Works

Bakker, Egbert J., Irene Document. F. de Jong, and Hans van Wees, eds. Brill's Escort to Herodotus. Boston: Brill, Locate this resource:

Harrison, Thomas.

Divinity become more intense History: The Religion of Herodotus. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Find that resource:

Lateiner, Donald. The Historical Road of Herodotus. Toronto: University clench Toronto Press, Find this resource:

Marincola, John, and Carolyn Dewald, system. The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus.

Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Keep, Find this resource:

Thomas, Rosalind. Herodotus in Context: Ethnography, Science, gift the Art of Persuasion. University, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, Hit upon this resource: